{"id":10871,"date":"2026-01-09T12:37:59","date_gmt":"2026-01-09T11:37:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/meine-renditeimmobilie.de\/?p=10871"},"modified":"2026-01-09T12:37:59","modified_gmt":"2026-01-09T11:37:59","slug":"art-as-an-investment-are-paintings-and-sculptures-sensible-investments","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/meine-renditeimmobilie.de\/en\/art-as-an-investment-are-paintings-and-sculptures-sensible-investments\/","title":{"rendered":"Art as an Investment \u2013 Are Paintings and Sculptures Sensible Investments?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-weight: bold\">\r\n\tArt is fascinating\u2014 aesthetically, culturally, and sometimes financially. But \u201cart as an investment\u201d is not a stock-market product; it is a market with its own rules: opaque, fragmented, and heavily dependent on taste, provenance, and timing. This article explains how returns in art arise in the first place, why pricing works the way it does, which risks (and costs) many people underestimate\u2014and what options exist even for small investors.\r\n<\/p>\r\n\r\n<section>\r\n\t<h2>What does \u201cart as an investment\u201d mean\u2014and what doesn\u2019t it mean?<\/h2>\r\n\t<p>\r\n\t\tWhen people talk about art as an investment, they usually mean <strong>capital appreciation<\/strong> (capital gains): a work is bought today and sold later at a higher price. Unlike stocks, there is no dividend, no ongoing coupons, and no standardized market price. Instead, value depends on a bundle of factors such as <em>rarity<\/em>, <em>condition<\/em>, <em>provenance<\/em>, <em>exhibition and publication history<\/em>, <em>market trend<\/em>, and\u2014last but not least\u2014the story that can be told around the work.\r\n\t<\/p>\r\n\t<p>\r\n\t\tAt the same time, \u201cinvestment\u201d in art is often closely tied to <strong>collecting motives<\/strong>: people buy not only for returns, but also for pleasure, status, cultural capital, or as an identity marker. This \u201cnon-financial dividend\u201d can be very real: if you love a work, it is easier to hold it for longer\u2014and that matters because the art market rarely offers quick liquidity.\r\n\t<\/p>\r\n\t<blockquote>\r\n\t\tMany wealth managers emphasize that, alongside opportunities, there are ongoing costs\u2014such as storage, climate control, and insurance. These \u201ccarry costs\u201d help determine whether an investment ends up truly delivering strong net returns.\r\n\t<\/blockquote>\r\n<\/section>\r\n\r\n<section>\r\n\t<h2>How prices are formed in the art market: auction, gallery, private sale<\/h2>\r\n\t<p>\r\n\t\tArt is traded in two broad \u201cworlds\u201d: the <strong>primary market<\/strong> (first sale via a gallery\/artist) and the <strong>secondary market<\/strong> (resale, e.g., at auction). In the primary market, prices are often \u201cset\u201d: galleries manage availability, place works with collectors, and try to build a market in a controlled way. In the secondary market, prices become more visible\u2014but also more volatile: auctions create public reference points, yet not every auction is representative\u2014one bidding war can push prices upward, and lack of interest can lead to a \u201cbought in\u201d result (unsold).\r\n\t<\/p>\r\n\r\n\t<div class=\"grid\">\r\n\t\t<div class=\"note\">\r\n\t\t\t<h3>Why \u201ctransparency\u201d is such a big topic in art<\/h3>\r\n\t\t\t<p>\r\n\t\t\t\tA large share of turnover happens through private deals. Even at auctions there are often guarantees, third parties,\r\n\t\t\t\tirrevocable bids, or discreet arrangements. This makes price discovery complex. Resale data (\u201crepeat sales\u201d) is therefore popular in research: it compares the same work across different years\u2014and offers a more realistic view of returns because it doesn\u2019t look only at \u201ctrophy records.\u201d\r\n\t\t\t<\/p>\r\n\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t<\/div>\r\n\r\n\t<h3>Typical costs investors should factor in<\/h3>\r\n\r\n\t<div class=\"mri-table-overflow\">\r\n\t\t<table>\r\n\t\t\t<thead>\r\n\t\t\t\t<tr>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<th>Cost item<\/th>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<th>Where does it occur?<\/th>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<th>Typical magnitude (rough)<\/th>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<th>Why it matters<\/th>\r\n\t\t\t\t<\/tr>\r\n\t\t\t<\/thead>\r\n\t\t\t<tbody>\r\n\t\t\t\t<tr>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<td>Auction premium \/ Buyer\u2019s Premium<\/td>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<td>When buying at auction<\/td>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<td>Several percent up to double digits, depending on the auction house &#038; price tier<\/td>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<td>Raises the entry price immediately\u2014acts like a \u201cspread.\u201d<\/td>\r\n\t\t\t\t<\/tr>\r\n\t\t\t\t<tr>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<td>Seller\u2019s commission<\/td>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<td>When selling (auction\/private)<\/td>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<td>Negotiable; can also be several percent<\/td>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<td>Reduces the exit proceeds\u2014critical when appreciation is only moderate.<\/td>\r\n\t\t\t\t<\/tr>\r\n\t\t\t\t<tr>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<td>Transport &#038; handling<\/td>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<td>Both directions<\/td>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<td>Depends on size, insurance, customs, risk<\/td>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<td>Can be significant for international purchases.<\/td>\r\n\t\t\t\t<\/tr>\r\n\t\t\t\t<tr>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<td>Insurance &#038; storage<\/td>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<td>Ongoing during the holding period<\/td>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<td>Annual; depends on value, location, security<\/td>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<td>Carry costs reduce net returns\u2014especially over longer holding periods.<\/td>\r\n\t\t\t\t<\/tr>\r\n\t\t\t\t<tr>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<td>Expert opinions, authentication, restoration<\/td>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<td>Before purchase \/ in case of issues \/ before sale<\/td>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<td>From moderate to very high<\/td>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<td>Can preserve value\u2014or uncover risks (forgery\/misattribution).<\/td>\r\n\t\t\t\t<\/tr>\r\n\t\t\t<\/tbody>\r\n\t\t<\/table>\r\n\t<\/div>\r\n\r\n\t<p class=\"small\">\r\n\t\tTip: If you compare returns with stocks, calculate <em>net of costs<\/em>. Art often has higher transaction costs than liquid financial markets, which raises the hurdle for \u201cgood\u201d performance.\r\n\t<\/p>\r\n<\/section>\r\n\r\n<section>\r\n\t<h2>A concrete price trajectory: \u201cSalvator Mundi\u201d (Leonardo da Vinci)<\/h2>\r\n\t<p>\r\n\t\tTo make tangible what \u201cprice development\u201d can mean in art, it helps to look at a prominent work with documented resales: <strong>\u201cSalvator Mundi\u201d<\/strong>, the painting attributed to Leonardo da Vinci that achieved a record price at Christie\u2019s in 2017. The case is extreme\u2014but instructive, because it shows how <em>attribution<\/em>, <em>story<\/em>, <em>scarcity<\/em>, and <em>marketing<\/em> can drive value.\r\n\t<\/p>\r\n\r\n\t<h3>Selected known transactions (nominal, in USD where stated)<\/h3>\r\n\t<ul>\r\n\t\t<li>\r\n\t\t\t<strong>1958<\/strong>: Sold at Sotheby\u2019s for <strong>\u00a345<\/strong> (then listed as the work of a pupil).\r\n\t\t<\/li>\r\n\t\t<li>\r\n\t\t\t<strong>2005<\/strong>: Bought at a regional U.S. auction for <strong>$1,175<\/strong>, catalogued as \u201cAfter Leonardo.\u201d\r\n\t\t<\/li>\r\n\t\t<li>\r\n\t\t\t<strong>2013<\/strong>: Sold for <strong>$80m<\/strong> to a company controlled by Yves Bouvier (private sale).\r\n\t\t<\/li>\r\n\t\t<li>\r\n\t\t\t<strong>2013<\/strong>: Resold for <strong>$127.5m<\/strong> to Dmitry Rybolovlev (private sale).\r\n\t\t<\/li>\r\n\t\t<li>\r\n\t\t\t<strong>15 November 2017<\/strong>: Auction at Christie\u2019s New York: <strong>$450,312,500<\/strong> (incl. Buyer\u2019s Premium).\r\n\t\t<\/li>\r\n\t<\/ul>\r\n\r\n\t<p>\r\n\t\tThe chart below visualizes this trajectory. Important: the jumps are so large that a <strong>logarithmic scale<\/strong> makes sense\u2014otherwise the early portion would be barely visible.\r\n\t<\/p>\r\n\r\n\t<figure>\r\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/meine-renditeimmobilie.de\/u\/salvator_mundi_preisentwicklung_v2.avif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/meine-renditeimmobilie.de\/u\/salvator_mundi_preisentwicklung_v2-1024x512.avif\" alt=\"Price development Salvator Mundi (logarithmic scale)\" width=\"1024\" height=\"512\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-10868\" srcset=\"https:\/\/meine-renditeimmobilie.de\/u\/salvator_mundi_preisentwicklung_v2-1024x512.avif 1024w, https:\/\/meine-renditeimmobilie.de\/u\/salvator_mundi_preisentwicklung_v2-300x150.avif 300w, https:\/\/meine-renditeimmobilie.de\/u\/salvator_mundi_preisentwicklung_v2-768x384.avif 768w, https:\/\/meine-renditeimmobilie.de\/u\/salvator_mundi_preisentwicklung_v2-1536x768.avif 1536w, https:\/\/meine-renditeimmobilie.de\/u\/salvator_mundi_preisentwicklung_v2.avif 2000w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/a>\r\n\t\t<figcaption class=\"small\">\r\n\t\t\tSource of transaction data: compiled from publicly reported sales and auction results. Prices are nominal and not adjusted for inflation.\r\n\t\t<\/figcaption>\r\n\t<\/figure>\r\n\r\n\t<div class=\"note\">\r\n\t\t<h3>What we can learn from the \u201cSalvator Mundi\u201d case<\/h3>\r\n\t\t<ul>\r\n\t\t\t<li>\r\n\t\t\t\t<strong>Authenticity\/attribution<\/strong> can be a value driver\u2014and a risk: if expert opinion shifts, market value can suffer dramatically.\r\n\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\t\t\t<li>\r\n\t\t\t\t<strong>There is no automatic liquidity premium<\/strong>: even extremely expensive works can remain \u201cinvisible\u201d for a long time after purchase.\r\n\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\t\t\t<li>\r\n\t\t\t\t<strong>Private sales are opaque<\/strong>: the 2013 prices are known, but details on terms\/fees are typically not public.\r\n\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\t\t\t<li>\r\n\t\t\t\t<strong>Marketing matters<\/strong>: Christie\u2019s placed the work in a Contemporary sale and staged it globally\u2014this can generate demand.\r\n\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\t\t<\/ul>\r\n\t<\/div>\r\n<\/section>\r\n\r\n<section>\r\n\t<h2>More prominent examples: the same work\u2014later more expensive (or with risks)<\/h2>\r\n\t<p>\r\n\t\tDo \u201ctrophy assets\u201d (top objects in the multi-million range) have relatively stable value development? This intuition is widespread\u2014and market data partly supports the idea that the very top end is often more resilient than the middle. At the same time, repeat-sales studies show that <strong>losses are common<\/strong> and that \u201cart returns\u201d can vary widely by period, segment, and methodology.\r\n\t<\/p>\r\n\r\n\t<h3>Examples with publicly reported resales<\/h3>\r\n\r\n\t<div class=\"mri-table-overflow\">\r\n\t\t<table>\r\n\t\t\t<thead>\r\n\t\t\t\t<tr>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<th>Work<\/th>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<th>Earlier purchase<\/th>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<th>Later sale<\/th>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<th>What does it show?<\/th>\r\n\t\t\t\t<\/tr>\r\n\t\t\t<\/thead>\r\n\t\t\t<tbody>\r\n\t\t\t\t<tr>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<td><strong>Gustav Klimt: \u201cPortrait of Adele Bloch-Bauer II\u201d (1912)<\/strong><\/td>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<td>2006: <strong>$87.9m<\/strong> (Christie\u2019s; buyer Oprah Winfrey, reported)<\/td>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<td>2016: <strong>$150m<\/strong> (private sale, reported)<\/td>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<td>An example that \u201cblue-chip\u201d art can appreciate strongly over 10 years\u2014net results still depend on costs\/taxes.<\/td>\r\n\t\t\t\t<\/tr>\r\n\t\t\t\t<tr>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<td><strong>Leonardo da Vinci (attributed): \u201cSalvator Mundi\u201d<\/strong><\/td>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<td>2005: <strong>$1,175<\/strong> (regional; as \u201cAfter Leonardo\u201d)<\/td>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<td>2017: <strong>$450.3m<\/strong> (Christie\u2019s, incl. premium)<\/td>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<td>Extreme case: re-attribution, restoration, storytelling, and scarcity can make prices explode\u2014but it\u2019s not predictable.<\/td>\r\n\t\t\t\t<\/tr>\r\n\t\t\t\t<tr>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<td><strong>Mark Rothko: \u201cNo. 6 (Violet, Green and Red)\u201d<\/strong><\/td>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<td>Before resale: reportedly about <strong>\u20ac80m<\/strong> paid by a dealer<\/td>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<td>2014: reportedly <strong>\u20ac140m<\/strong> sold to a collector<\/td>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<td>Shows market mechanics: dealer margins\/information advantages, opacity, and the risk of buying in too high.<\/td>\r\n\t\t\t\t<\/tr>\r\n\t\t\t<\/tbody>\r\n\t\t<\/table>\r\n\t<\/div>\r\n\r\n\t<p>\r\n\t\tNote: for private deals, details (payment terms, fees, guarantees) are often unclear. For investment analysis, auctions are more transparent\u2014but even there factors like guarantees and premium structures can matter.\r\n\t<\/p>\r\n<\/section>\r\n\r\n<section>\r\n\t<h2>Return, risk, correlation: what do studies and market reports say?<\/h2>\r\n\t<p>\r\n\t\tWith art returns you have to look very carefully at <em>how<\/em> they are measured. A common approach uses <strong>repeat-sales indices<\/strong> (e.g., Mei\/Moses), which include only works that traded at least twice. This reduces some biases, but it is not perfect: works that are never resold (because they enter museums or remain in family collections) don\u2019t show up. Moreover, art markets are segmented: \u201cContemporary\u201d behaves differently from \u201cOld Masters,\u201d and within any segment artists, periods, and specific bodies of work matter enormously.\r\n\t<\/p>\r\n\r\n\t<h3>A few robust observations<\/h3>\r\n\t<ul>\r\n\t\t<li>\r\n\t\t\t<strong>Over the long term, art can perform moderately positively<\/strong>, but it is often described as less liquid and more expensive to trade.\r\n\t\t<\/li>\r\n\t\t<li>\r\n\t\t\t<strong>Diversification<\/strong>: several analyses discuss relatively low correlation with traditional assets\u2014though the data is thinner than for stocks\/bonds.\r\n\t\t<\/li>\r\n\t\t<li>\r\n\t\t\t<strong>More recent phases can also be weak<\/strong>: some newer evaluations and market commentary point to weaker returns and\/or high dispersion in recent years.\r\n\t\t<\/li>\r\n\t<\/ul>\r\n\r\n\t<div class=\"note\">\r\n\t\t<h3>\u201cTop end vs. the rest\u201d \u2014 why trophy works often appear more stable<\/h3>\r\n\t\t<p>\r\n\t\t\tMarket reports (e.g., Art Basel &#038; UBS) regularly describe how the art market\u2019s top end is dominated by a small number of  extremely sought-after names. Buyers compete globally, supply is scarce, and prestige effects are strong. This can create a kind of \u201cquality premium.\u201d But: even trophy art is not immune to shifts in taste, reputation damage, authenticity debates, or liquidity bottlenecks when many want to sell at the same time.\r\n\t\t<\/p>\r\n\t<\/div>\r\n\r\n\t<h3>What investors often underestimate<\/h3>\r\n\t<ul>\r\n\t\t<li>\r\n\t\t\t<strong>Illiquidity<\/strong>: a \u201cfair price\u201d is often achievable only if you have time (and the right channel).\r\n\t\t<\/li>\r\n\t\t<li>\r\n\t\t\t<strong>Risk concentration<\/strong>: a single work is a concentrated bet. Even blue-chip artists can be cyclical.\r\n\t\t<\/li>\r\n\t\t<li>\r\n\t\t\t<strong>Net return<\/strong>: after premiums, commissions, storage, and insurance, the math looks different.\r\n\t\t<\/li>\r\n\t\t<li>\r\n\t\t\t<strong>Information asymmetry<\/strong>: professionals know more (or have better networks)\u2014especially in private sales.\r\n\t\t<\/li>\r\n\t<\/ul>\r\n<\/section>\r\n\r\n<section>\r\n\t<h2>Is art suitable for small investors?<\/h2>\r\n\t<p>\r\n\t\tYes\u2014but rarely in the way the headline \u201cart as an investment\u201d suggests. If you enter with a limited budget, you can still participate meaningfully, but you should accept different goals and rules: less \u201cbeating the market,\u201d more <strong>learning curve<\/strong>, <strong>enjoyment<\/strong>, and <strong>risk management<\/strong>.\r\n\t<\/p>\r\n\r\n\t<h3>Four realistic paths for small investors<\/h3>\r\n\t<ol>\r\n\t\t<li>\r\n\t\t\t<strong>\u201cBuy what you love\u201d\u2014but with a system<\/strong>: Instead of speculating on quick wins, buy into niches you understand (photography, editions, local scenes). A long-term collection can build value\u2014and even if it doesn\u2019t, the utility remains (aesthetics, culture).\r\n\t\t<\/li>\r\n\t\t<li>\r\n\t\t\t<strong>Editions\/prints\/photography<\/strong>: Editions are more accessible, but price development depends heavily on edition size, signature, condition, and market demand. Research is often more important here than budget.\r\n\t\t<\/li>\r\n\t\t<li>\r\n\t\t\t<strong>Fractional ownership \/ platform models<\/strong>: Models like \u201cshares in a work\u201d lower the entry barrier, but they don\u2019t remove the risks. Pay attention to the structure (e.g., special-purpose vehicle), fees, holding periods, tradability of shares, and the fact that past performance is no guarantee.\r\n\t\t<\/li>\r\n\t\t<li>\r\n\t\t\t<strong>Indirect exposure<\/strong>: If you want art-market exposure but don\u2019t want storage\/authenticity risks, you can also think indirectly (e.g., companies in the art ecosystem). That is then more of a classic equity play than \u201cowning art.\u201d\r\n\t\t<\/li>\r\n\t<\/ol>\r\n\r\n\t<div class=\"note\">\r\n\t\t<h3>Practical checklist for getting started below the million-euro league<\/h3>\r\n\t\t<ul>\r\n\t\t\t<li>\r\n\t\t\t\t<strong>Provenance &#038; documentation<\/strong>: keep invoices, certificates, edition info, exhibitions\u2014collect everything.\r\n\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\t\t\t<li>\r\n\t\t\t\t<strong>Condition<\/strong>: condition is price. Small damages can make resale much harder.\r\n\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\t\t\t<li>\r\n\t\t\t\t<strong>Comparable prices<\/strong>: if possible, compare auction data\/marketplaces; beware of dealer \u201casking prices.\u201d\r\n\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\t\t\t<li>\r\n\t\t\t\t<strong>Channel strategy<\/strong>: where would you sell later\u2014auction, gallery, private? Each channel has different costs\/opportunities.\r\n\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\t\t\t<li>\r\n\t\t\t\t<strong>Budget for ancillary costs<\/strong>: framing, transport, insurance\u2014this is where people often \u201cforget\u201d to calculate with smaller works.\r\n\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\t\t<\/ul>\r\n\t<\/div>\r\n<\/section>\r\n\r\n<section>\r\n\t<h2>Common assumption: \u201cOnly top objects are relatively safe\u201d\u2014is that true?<\/h2>\r\n\t<p>\r\n\t\tThis assessment is understandable: the market can look \u201cbarbell-shaped\u201d\u2014very strong demand at the very top, and a lot of uncertainty below. Market reports in recent years often emphasize that the highest price tier is carried by a small number of names and very scarce works, while mid-tier segments can fluctuate more.\r\n\t<\/p>\r\n\t<p>\r\n\t\tStill, a nuance matters: <strong>safety<\/strong> is not guaranteed even at the top. Trophy works are more expensive, but not automatically more liquid\u2014on the contrary, the buyer pool is smaller, and the \u201cright stage\u201d is crucial. And a work below the million level can perform <em>relatively<\/em> well if you truly understand the field (artist career, curatorial attention, museum acquisitions, critical reception).\r\n\t<\/p>\r\n\r\n\t<h3>A pragmatic view<\/h3>\r\n\t<ul>\r\n\t\t<li>\r\n\t\t\t<strong>Top objects<\/strong> often have better market infrastructure (advisors, guarantees, global buyers)\u2014this can provide stability.\r\n\t\t<\/li>\r\n\t\t<li>\r\n\t\t\t<strong>Below that<\/strong> dispersion is larger: you can find both \u201c10x\u201d stories and quiet value erosion.\r\n\t\t<\/li>\r\n\t\t<li>\r\n\t\t\t<strong>Know-how<\/strong> can create more edge in the mid\/low end than at the top, where every professional is bidding.\r\n\t\t<\/li>\r\n\t<\/ul>\r\n<\/section>\r\n\r\n<section>\r\n\t<h2>Art can be an investment\u2014but rarely an \u201ceasy\u201d one<\/h2>\r\n\t<p>\r\n\t\tArt as an investment works best if you don\u2019t treat it like a stock. The big wins often come from a combination of knowledge,\r\n\t\taccess, timing\u2014and luck. At the same time, art can be a sensible component if you accept its specifics: high transaction costs,\r\n\t\tilliquidity, information asymmetries, but also the possibility to \u201cconsume\u201d cultural and emotional value while you hold.\r\n\t<\/p>\r\n\t<p>\r\n\t\tFor small investors, the most realistic approach is often: start small, take documentation seriously, calculate ancillary costs,\r\n\t\tand invest more in learning + network than in \u201cthe quick flip.\u201d And if you do prioritize returns, it\u2019s often smarter to think\r\n\t\t<strong>diversified<\/strong> and structured\u2014while keeping a very clear eye on fees and liquidity.\r\n\t<\/p>\r\n<\/section>\r\n\r\n\r\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Art is fascinating\u2014 aesthetically, culturally, and sometimes financially. But \u201cart as an investment\u201d is not a stock-market product; it is [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_locale":"en_US","_original_post":"https:\/\/meine-renditeimmobilie.de\/?p=10862","footnotes":""},"categories":[169],"tags":[],"post_folder":[267],"class_list":["post-10871","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-capital-investment","en-US"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/meine-renditeimmobilie.de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10871","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/meine-renditeimmobilie.de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/meine-renditeimmobilie.de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/meine-renditeimmobilie.de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/meine-renditeimmobilie.de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10871"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/meine-renditeimmobilie.de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10871\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11401,"href":"https:\/\/meine-renditeimmobilie.de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10871\/revisions\/11401"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/meine-renditeimmobilie.de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10871"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/meine-renditeimmobilie.de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10871"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/meine-renditeimmobilie.de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10871"},{"taxonomy":"post_folder","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/meine-renditeimmobilie.de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/post_folder?post=10871"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}